Connect with us

Politics

In 9-0 Supreme Court Decision – SCOTUS Rules Against 9th Circuit, Blocks Asylum To Denied Border Crossers

Published

on

What’s Happening:

With Joe Biden in the White House and Democrats making Congress into a circus, it falls to the Supreme Court to defend our Constitution.

And in recent days, they’ve been doing a bang-up job.

The court has made critical rulings that have upheld Americans’ rights, while checking the left’s out-of-control agenda.

We recently discussed their ruling denying a man’s demands to reenter the country. Now, the entire court once again denied Democrats their immigration wishes.

From Breitbart:

The U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) on Tuesday held that federal courts have a limited role in reviewing immigration judge findings, reversing a decision from the Ninth Circuit appeals court that helped grant immigration relief to illegal aliens seeking asylum…

The Supreme Court found that the Ninth Circuit went out of its way, using its “deemed-true-or-credible rule,” to provide immigration relief to Alcaraz-Enriquez and Dai while ignoring the evidence used by an immigration judge and the BIA to deny them relief.

It appears the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals was overruling immigration judges’ decisions.

The federal court had taken upon itself the power to invalidate a court, whose job it was to rule in immigration cases.

But the Supreme Court put the 9th in its place, stating that the appeals court was ignoring evidence to grant migrants entrance into the United States.

Let’s be honest here. An immigration court has the burdensome duty to review these cases, look at all the evidence, and decide if an asylum-seekers truly deserves to stay.

However, the 9th Circuit appeared to be rejecting evidence to grant asylum requests. Perhaps some of the far-left judges on the 9th were letting their activist agenda get in the way?

In the cases present to the SCOTUS, there was serious evidence that the 9th was ignoring. Both asylum seekers had either lied or were clearly not eligible for asylum.

Why did the 9th Circuit ignore that evidence? We can’t say for sure, but maybe they’re making decisions based on politics, not the law.

But the fact remains that the Supreme Court made a historic decision that will affect major cases moving forward.

They decided that federal courts only have a “limited role” in deciding cases already ruled on by immigration judges.

This decision will prevent potentially activist judges on the 9th (or other appeals courts) from granting asylum to folks who don’t deserve it.

Democrats must be stewing right now.

Are you glad the Supreme Court is protecting America’s border?

Key Takeaways:

  • The Supreme Court ruled that federal courts had a limited role in overturning immigration cases.
  • It overturned decisions by the 9th Circuit, which granted asylum to unqualified seekers.
  • The court voted unanimously, 9-0.

Source: Breitbart

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Politics

Idaho lieutenant gov issues vaccine order, tries to send National Guard troops to southern border while gov is out of state

Published

on

For the second time this year, Republican Idaho Lt. Gov. Janice McGeachin attempted to take advantage of Republican Idaho Gov. Brad Little’s absence to issue a COVID-19 related executive order — but the governor isn’t having any of it.

What happened?

With Little out of state Tuesday, McGeachin issued an executive order barring employers in the state from implementing vaccine mandates for employees, the Associated Press reported.

Little was in Texas meeting with nine other Republican governors over concerns about President Biden’s handling of the crisis at the U.S. southern border when the order was issued. But after he caught wind of McGeachin’s maneuvering, Little issued a statement saying that he never authorized the order and vowing to repeal it immediately upon his return.

“I am in Texas performing my duties as the duly elected Governor of Idaho, and I have not authorized the Lt. Governor to act on my behalf,” Little said in a statement shortly after arriving in Texas on Tuesday. “I will be rescinding and reversing any actions taken by the Lt. Governor when I return.”

The AP noted that Little is expected back in the state Wednesday evening. The news agency also noted that in Idaho, the governor and lieutenant governor don’t run on the same ticket. In fact, McGeachin is running for governor against Little in the state’s next election.

What else?

McGeachin wasn’t finished there, however. She also sought to deploy Idaho National Guard troops to the U.S.-Mexico border this week in Little’s absence.

In a letter to Maj. Gen. Michael J. Garshak obtained by the AP, McGeachin wrote, “As of Wednesday, my constitutional authority as Governor affords me the power of activating the Idaho National Guard. As the Adjutant General, I am requesting information from you on the steps needed for the Governor to activate the National Guard.”

The lieutenant governor’s request was ultimately rebuffed, but Little took notice of the attempt and used it to slam his opponent.

“Attempting to deploy our National Guard for political grandstanding is an affront to the Idaho constitution and insults the men and women who have dedicated their life to serving our state and the country,” Little said in a statement.

Anything else?

In May, while Little was in Nashville, Tennessee, attending a meeting of the Republican Governors Association, McGeachin issued an executive order barring local governments from implementing mask mandates.

Little, who had never implemented a statewide mask mandate in Idaho, called the order an “irresponsible, self-serving political stunt.”

Source

Continue Reading

Politics

Glenn Beck: Electricity shortages in China mean empty shelves ARE coming. Here’s how to PREPARE

Published

on

On the “Glenn Beck Radio Program,” Glenn explained why he wouldn’t be surprised to see our supply chain collapse and empty shelves in America in the near future. Shortages are already wrecking our economy, China (where many of our goods are still made) is facing an energy shortage, and the Biden administration sure seems to be doing everything it can to make things worse.

Glenn noted a serious warning from American CEO Mike Beckham: “There’s a major storm brewing in the supply chain,” Beckham wrote on Twitter.

Thanks to China’s centrally planned system, electricity shortages are causing huge delays in product manufacturing. In fact, some items are facing a 33 percent cut in production. “It could dramatically impact every [American’s] life next year. But almost no one knows about it yet,” Beckham warned.

Glenn went on to explain exactly what this means for you — and what you can do to prepare.

Watch the video clip below to hear Glenn break it down:

Source

Continue Reading

Politics

It Begins: Federal Investigators Are Issuing Warrants for Google to Turn Over Anyone Typing in Certain Search Terms

Published

on

It begins.
The federal government is issuing warrants from compliant Google to turn over anyone typing in certain search terms.

But they assure the American public that they can be trusted. Just like the federal government assured Americans they would not abuse the secret FISA courts to spy on innocent Americans!

We now know that crooked feds were spying on Donald Trump, his family, his campaign and his presidency using the secret courts to obtain warrants.

This is your brave new world. Get used to it.

Yahoo reported:

The U.S. government is reportedly secretly issuing warrants for Google to provide user data on anyone typing in certain search terms, raising fears that innocent online users could get caught up in serious crime investigations at a greater frequency than previously thought.

In an attempt to track down criminals, federal investigators have started using new “keyword warrants” and used them to ask Google to provide them information on anyone who searched a victim’s name or their address during a particular year, an accidentally unsealed court document that Forbes found shows.

Google has to respond to thousands of warrant orders each year, but the keyword warrants are a relatively new strategy used by the government and are controversial.

“Trawling through Google’s search history database enables police to identify people merely based on what they might have been thinking about, for whatever reason, at some point in the past,” Jennifer Granick, surveillance and cybersecurity counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union, told Forbes.

“This never-before-possible technique threatens First Amendment interests and will inevitably sweep up innocent people, especially if the keyword terms are not unique and the time frame not precise. To make matters worse, police are currently doing this in secret, which insulates the practice from public debate and regulation,” she added.

The government said that the scope of the warrants is limited to avoid implicating innocent people who happen to search for certain terms, but it’s not publicly disclosed how many users’ data are sent to the government and what the extent of the warrant requests are.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending